Selection criteria
Selection criteria are assigned for video guidelines. Video Guideline 1 is for teams, which are more advanced in solutions development, and during three months mentoring period will be focus on specifying the solution, whereas Video Guideline 2 is for teams, which are just starting their solutions development, but are sure that after three months mentoring period will be ready to present the specific solution. Jury will evaluate the videos using selection criteria and every team will get the final score along with comments from jury members individually.
SELECTION CRITERIA FOR GUIDELINE 1
How the solution answers the problems-challenges identified by partners?
(0-3 points – 3: excellent, 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations);
Original concepts in at least a local food industry context
(0-3 points - 3: excellent, 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations);
How team determines the budget of the solution implementation?
(0-2 points - 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations);
How do you rate a team composition? Teams, which were unable to clearly identify their team composition, including names of team members, in the submitted video, are not considered to meet the criteria for the team quality.
(points - 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations).
SELECTION CRITERIA FOR GUIDELINE 2
How the idea of solution answer the problems-challenges identified by partners?
(0-3 points – 3: excellent, 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations);
The Assessment of preparatory analysis and desk research undertaken
(0-3 points - 3: well defined and relevant problem, presented in details, and with a broad perspective, 2: a problem is well defined, but still it lacks important details, 1: problem is described, although it seems to be vague, 0: problem is not defined);
How do you rate team composition? Teams, which were unable to clearly identify their team composition, including names of team members, in the submitted video, are not considered to meet the criteria for a team quality
(0-2 points - 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations);
How are they going to manage the possible risk in the solution implementation?
(0-2 points - 2: very good, 1: good, 0: below expectations).
After applying you shoul wait for our feedback untill the 22th July 2019. The jury will announce 25 teams (without showing ranking of points) which will participate in 3 months mentoring on the website. Even if your team is not included, we will send you your score and comments from the jury via e-mail.